CVE-2026-31716
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: validate rec->used in journal-replay file record check check_file_record() validates rec->total against the record size but never validates rec->used. The do_action() journal-replay handlers read rec->used from disk and use it to compute memmove lengths: DeleteAttribute: memmove(attr, ..., used - asize - roff) CreateAttribute: memmove(..., attr, used - roff) change_attr_size: memmove(..., used - PtrOffset(rec, next)) When rec->used is smaller than the offset of a validated attribute, or larger than the record size, these subtractions can underflow allowing us to copy huge amounts of memory in to a 4kb buffer, generally considered a bad idea overall. This requires a corrupted filesystem, which isn't a threat model the kernel really needs to worry about, but checking for such an obvious out-of-bounds value is good to keep things robust, especially on journal replay Fix this up by bounding rec->used correctly. This is much like commit b2bc7c44ed17 ("fs/ntfs3: Fix slab-out-of-bounds read in DeleteIndexEntryRoot") which checked different values in this same switch statement.
Schwachstellenklasse
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: validate rec->used in journal-replay file record check check_file_record() validates rec->total against the record size but never validates rec->used. The do_action() journal-replay handlers read rec->used from disk and use it to compute memmove lengths: DeleteAttribute: memmove(attr, ..., used - asize - roff) CreateAttribute: memmove(..., attr, used - roff) change_attr_size: memmove(..., used - PtrOffset(rec, next)) When rec->used is smaller than the offset of a validated attribute, or larger than the record size, these subtractions can underflow allowing us to copy huge amounts of memory in to a 4kb buffer, generally considered a bad idea overall. This requires a corrupted filesystem, which isn't a threat model the kernel really needs to worry about, but checking for such an obvious out-of-bounds value is good to keep things robust, especially on journal replay Fix this up by bounding rec->used correctly. This is much like commit b2bc7c44ed17 ("fs/ntfs3: Fix slab-out-of-bounds read in DeleteIndexEntryRoot") which checked different values in this same switch statement.
Betroffene Produkte
- linux linux_kernel
Quellen
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0112e6279420d4005b3d57af36fb45c01b8d0116
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ca0485e4b2e837ebb6cbd4f2451aba665a03e4b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1393a467a9607e62123806de7d4c3a3e54e396a9
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4b1613d7e2deda831a97e427d1ea586e50fe1be5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e64d33198b5a0fb14a452708bad844f94f03b2c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f79d0403ea20a81bc29105bba54fbcab54e8c403
Finden Sie die Schwachstelle, bevor es ein Angreifer tut.
Melden Sie sich mit GitHub an und starten Sie Ihr erstes Audit in weniger als einer Minute. Für den kostenlosen Plan ist keine Kreditkarte nötig.